<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8 Landmarks in Information Security History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securitymusings.com/article/219/8-landmarks-in-information-security-history/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securitymusings.com/article/219/8-landmarks-in-information-security-history</link>
	<description>Rants and raves from information security professionals</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hesse</title>
		<link>http://securitymusings.com/article/219/8-landmarks-in-information-security-history#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitymusings.com/article/219/8-landmarks-in-information-security-history#comment-85</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;I think the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILOVEYOU" rel="nofollow" &gt;I love you&lt;/a&gt; worm was pretty key as well.  I was working at a security company at the time, and &lt;strong&gt;we&lt;/strong&gt; had two people click the darn thing.  Basically that event is when emails changed directions from being more interactive to being less interactive.  Now in order to send a harmless digital certificate to someone, I have to put it in a zip file, because Outlook considers it a threat.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILOVEYOU" rel="nofollow" >I love you</a> worm was pretty key as well.  I was working at a security company at the time, and <strong>we</strong> had two people click the darn thing.  Basically that event is when emails changed directions from being more interactive to being less interactive.  Now in order to send a harmless digital certificate to someone, I have to put it in a zip file, because Outlook considers it a threat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slinky</title>
		<link>http://securitymusings.com/article/219/8-landmarks-in-information-security-history#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Slinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitymusings.com/article/219/8-landmarks-in-information-security-history#comment-84</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;1) 1995: The advent of MP3 on the internet.  While &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DRM&lt;/span&gt; was not a new concept (think &#8220;dongles&#8221; and copy protection), applying it to massive amounts of data instead of just applications was.  The MP3 and subsequent Napster phenomenon has driven information security for DVDs, digital content, even the architecture of Windows Vista.  I think that qualifies as significant.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;2) 1975: &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DES&lt;/span&gt; is published.  Cryptography for the masses.  Enabler of many things, including the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ATM&lt;/span&gt; network.  &lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;3) 1996: &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SSL&lt;/span&gt; 3.0 &#8211; Provides the basic security framework necessary for all of E-Commerce to exist.  According to the US Census Bureau, 3Q 2007 E-Commerce sales accounted for 3.4% of all US retail sales.  More significant than any worm on the above list.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Speaking of things to be removed from the list:&lt;br /&gt;
Witty Worm&lt;br /&gt;
Titan Rain&lt;br /&gt;
Storm Worm&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;None of these three impacted regular people in any substantial way.  Witty Worm forced a few product vendors to put out a patch.  Titan Rain might not even be what it claims to be (probably just some hackers, not a &#8220;government attack&#8221;).  Storm Worm: The Soup Du Jour.  Very scary stuff..;)&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) 1995: The advent of MP3 on the internet.  While <span class="caps">DRM</span> was not a new concept (think &#8220;dongles&#8221; and copy protection), applying it to massive amounts of data instead of just applications was.  The MP3 and subsequent Napster phenomenon has driven information security for DVDs, digital content, even the architecture of Windows Vista.  I think that qualifies as significant.</p>
<p>2) 1975: <span class="caps">DES</span> is published.  Cryptography for the masses.  Enabler of many things, including the <span class="caps">ATM</span> network.  </p>
<p>3) 1996: <span class="caps">SSL</span> 3.0 &#8211; Provides the basic security framework necessary for all of E-Commerce to exist.  According to the US Census Bureau, 3Q 2007 E-Commerce sales accounted for 3.4% of all US retail sales.  More significant than any worm on the above list.</p>
<p>Speaking of things to be removed from the list:</p>
<p>Witty Worm</p>
<p>Titan Rain</p>
<p>Storm Worm</p>
<p>None of these three impacted regular people in any substantial way.  Witty Worm forced a few product vendors to put out a patch.  Titan Rain might not even be what it claims to be (probably just some hackers, not a &#8220;government attack&#8221;).  Storm Worm: The Soup Du Jour.  Very scary stuff..;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil Polat</title>
		<link>http://securitymusings.com/article/219/8-landmarks-in-information-security-history#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil Polat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitymusings.com/article/219/8-landmarks-in-information-security-history#comment-83</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;I think Storm is overrated. I&#8217;d put Sasser, or Blaster on there.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;They put businesses on alert, and the reported network disruptions forced big companies to take these threats more seriously.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Also, a lot has been done to &lt;strong&gt;improve&lt;/strong&gt; information security over that time &#8211; some positives could have made the list as well.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Storm is overrated. I&#8217;d put Sasser, or Blaster on there.</p>
<p>They put businesses on alert, and the reported network disruptions forced big companies to take these threats more seriously.</p>
<p>Also, a lot has been done to <strong>improve</strong> information security over that time &#8211; some positives could have made the list as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
